top of page


How should we understand the communicative status of emojis? Are they a new "language”?
If we take seriously the idea that language is a symbolic technology—a system for encoding and externalising our conceptualisations—then emojis present a fascinating case study. They are not mere decorative add‑ons. They are part of the evolving semiotic ecology through which humans coordinate meaning in digitally mediated environments.

Vyvyan Evans
Feb 252 min read


What does it truly mean to “know” a language? Is linguistic knowledge qualitatively different in first-language versus additional-language acquisition?
To “know” a language is not to possess an abstract rulebook lodged somewhere in the recesses of the mind. Nor is it to have internalised a set of syntactic transformations or parameter settings. Rather, it is to have entrenched a vast network of symbolic pairings — constructions — that link form and meaning, and to be able to deploy them flexibly in situated interaction.

Vyvyan Evans
Feb 253 min read


Why is Cognitive Linguistics an "enterprise", not a theory?
When I describe Cognitive Linguistics as an “enterprise,” I do so quite deliberately. It was never merely a theory in the narrow sense — not simply a competing model of syntax or semantics. It emerged, rather, as a broad intellectual movement united by a shared set of commitments about the nature of mind, meaning, and language.

Vyvyan Evans
Feb 252 min read
bottom of page